FAQ

One operating model for ownership, controls, evidence and improvement across Applications, Identity, Data and AI — so you can continuously demonstrate you're in control, instead of reconstructing that once a year for an audit. See the Digital Governance page for the full explanation.

Organisations already running Microsoft, Zluri or comparable IAM/SaaS tooling, where ownership, controls and evidence are still fragmented or manual. If that sounds familiar, see the Use Cases.

No. Apdagio uses your tooling — it is not the tool. The technical layer (Microsoft Entra, Purview, Defender, Zluri, your own IAM/security stack) stays in place; Apdagio delivers the governance layer above it: who owns what, which controls apply, and how you demonstrate that.

Apdagio is a VAR partner of Zluri and deploys it where it fits within your SaaS and identity governance — as part of the wider operating model, not as a goal in itself.

The first demonstrable results — owners, controls and evidence on one defined domain — are the premise of the 90-day approach. The exact timeline depends on scope and how quickly decisions and access are arranged internally; we determine that together during the exploratory call.

That depends on scope and starting domain, so we don't publish a fixed price list. After a no-obligation 30-minute exploratory call, you'll receive a concrete proposal tailored to your situation.

Yes — the 90-day approach is deliberately designed to start small and focused on one domain (for example SaaS & Identity), rather than a large transformation programme. That scales just as well for a smaller organisation as for a larger one.

Governance isn't a one-off project but an ongoing operating model: Continuous Governance. After the first domain, you expand to the next (for example from SaaS & Identity to Data and AI), using the same ownership and control structure.

Via the contact form on the contact page — you'll receive a reply within one business day with a proposed time.